Key result
Epicardial fat gain over 12 months after kidney transplantation was not independently associated with a difference in left ventricular mass index change compared to epicardial fat loss after multivariate adjustment (interaction p = 0.538).
Why the study?
Does epicardial fat gain associate with changes in left ventricular mass index in incident kidney transplant patients over 12 months?
Cohort (n=98)
Open-label
No
Does epicardial fat gain associate with changes in left ventricular mass index in incident kidney transplant patients over 12 months?
Absolute Event Rate: -18% vs -42%
p-value: p=0.538
Epicardial fat gain over 12 months after kidney transplantation was not independently associated with changes in left ventricular mass index.
EF rose post-KTX without independent LVM association; leaves open EF monitoring for CV risk in kidney recipients.
BACKGROUND: Epicardial fat (EF) has been related to increased cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease patients. Kidney transplantation is associated with weight gain, especially within the first 12 months. Recently an association between EF and left ventricular mass (LVM) has been suggested in kidney transplant (KTX) recipients. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the EF in KTX recipients and its association with cardiovascular parameters in a 12-month follow-up study. METHODS: EF volume was determined using thoracic computed tomography. The EF progressor group (EF gain) was defined by any increment in EF after 12 months. LVM and LVM index were calculated by echocardiography. RESULTS: Ninety-eight incident KTX patients [57% men, 41.2 ± 10.1 years, mean dialysis time prior to transplant of 24 (11-60) months] were analyzed. At baseline and after 12 months, EF was 318.6 (275.2-392.6) ml and 329.5 (271.7-384.8) ml, respectively (p = 0.03). When compared to patients who EF decreased (n = 33), those with EF gain (n = 65) had a greater increase of body mass index, abdominal circumference and blood glucose. These patients also had a lower reduction of LVM index. However in the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in LVM index change between groups (interaction p = 0.565), even after adjustment for hypertension, glucose and coronary calcium score (interaction p = 0.538). CONCLUSION: The impact of EF gain on ventricular mass after KTX could not be definitely confirmed. Further prospective studies in a large sample of KTX patients should be considered to address a possible causal relationship between EF gain and cardiac hypertrophy in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yazbek et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Incident kidney transplant (n=98). Epicardial fat gain vs. Epicardial fat decrease was evaluated on Change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (p=0.538). Epicardial fat gain over 12 months after kidney transplantation was not independently associated with a difference in left ventricular mass index change compared to epicardial fat loss after multivariate adjustment (interaction p = 0.538).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: