Key result
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance provides high-resolution imaging that allows for the accurate diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and its differentiation from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance improve the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and its differentiation from restrictive cardiomyopathy?
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance improve the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and its differentiation from restrictive cardiomyopathy?
CMR is a highly accurate imaging modality for diagnosing constrictive pericarditis and distinguishing it from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
May support CMR for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has a high diagnostic accuracy for constrictive pericarditis (CP). CMR allows for high-resolution imaging of the pericardium and associated structures in any imaging plane compared with that provided by other imaging modalities. We briefly discuss the specific quantitative and qualitative CMR sequences that can be tailored to answer the clinical questions pertaining to CP, where the diagnostic yield has been proven when characteristic CMR features of CP are present. Such features allow for differentiation of CP from restrictive cardiomyopathy, where the clinical differentiation between the 2 can often be challenging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ariyarajah et al. (2009) conducted a review in Constrictive pericarditis. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance provides high-resolution imaging that allows for the accurate diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and its differentiation from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: