Why the study?
Does Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) improve the diagnosis of pericardial diseases?
Does Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) improve the diagnosis of pericardial diseases?
CMR, including novel radio-frequency tissue tagging, is a valuable non-invasive imaging tool for diagnosing complex pericardial diseases such as constrictive pericarditis.
CMR may aid pericardial disease evaluation in complex cases; leaves open need for prospective validation before broader adoption.
BACKGROUND: Pericardial diseases are relatively common in clinical practice and encountered in various clinical settings with consequent significant morbidity and mortality. However, the diagnosis as well as management can be complex and challenging, as the clinical presentation is usually non-specific. Therefore, there is an increasing role for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) as an imaging tool to facilitate the diagnosis of pericardial diseases. CONCLUSION: Herein we describe conventional and unique CMR approaches to provide an increased non-invasive understanding of the pericardium in health and disease including a novel method to diagnose constrictive pericarditis via radio-frequency tissue tagging by defining unique visceralparietal adherence patterns easily learned by the cardiologist and radiologist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldweib et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: