Key result
Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure with the AVP4 device was successfully performed in 5 patients after CoreValve TAVI, with 0 procedural complications and symptomatic improvement in 4 patients.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous paravalvular leak closure with the AVP4 device improve residual aortic regurgitation and symptoms in patients with symptomatic AR after CoreValve TAVI?
Case Report (n=5)
Does percutaneous paravalvular leak closure with the AVP4 device improve residual aortic regurgitation and symptoms in patients with symptomatic AR after CoreValve TAVI?
Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure using the AVP4 device is feasible and may improve symptoms and regurgitation severity in patients with significant paravalvular leak after CoreValve TAVI.
Supports procedural feasibility of AVP4 for post-CoreValve paravalvular AR; leaves open safety and efficacy in larger cohorts.
OBJECTIVES: We present a case series of five patients in whom percutaneous paravalvular leak closure with the AVP4 device has been undertaken for symptomatic aortic regurgitation after CoreValve TAVI. BACKGROUND: Significant post-procedure aortic regurgitation (AR) is often difficult to assess, and is an important predictor of adverse outcome following TAVI. Paravalvular leak closure is an established procedure for surgical aortic prostheses, and has been undertaken for Edwards TAVIs, but has not been described for closure of CoreValve paravalvular leaks. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five patients were treated (mean age 81 ± 4 years) with residual grade 3-4 AR following placement of a single CoreValve (n = 2), double CoreValve (n = 2) or CoreValve within a bioprosthetic AVR (n = 1). The mean time post TAVI implantation was 308 ± 269 days. All patients were symptomatic with persistent NYHA Grade III dyspnoea. 6 devices were deployed successfully, with mean procedure time of 109 ± 23 min. There were no procedural complications and all patients were discharged home by Day 2. Residual AR after treatment was grade 0 (n = 2), grade 1 (n = 1), grade 2 (n = 1) and grade 3 (n = 1). Symptomatic improvement was noted in all 4 patients who have been reviewed in clinic since. CONCLUSIONS: This small series demonstrates the feasibility of paravalvular leak closure with the CoreValve TAVI, despite the adverse aortic lattice. The AVP4 device is ideally suited to this situation as it will pass through a 0.038' lumen and can therefore be delivered down standard diagnostic catheters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arri et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Symptomatic aortic regurgitation after CoreValve TAVI (n=5). Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure with the AVP4 device was evaluated on Procedural success, residual aortic regurgitation, and symptomatic improvement. Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure with the AVP4 device was successfully performed in 5 patients after CoreValve TAVI, with 0 procedural complications and symptomatic improvement in 4 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: