PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 21, 2026DiagnosticsOpen Access

Multiplex-PCR Identification of Positive Blood Cultures: Pathogen Epidemiology, Resistance Determinants, and the Economic and Interpretive Cost of Qualitative Rapid Diagnosis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LLLaura LupoISIlaria SerafiniDCDaniela Chirizzi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial examines rapid multiplex-PCR impacts on pathogen detection and costs in bloodstream infections, suggesting improvements for diagnostics.

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of multiplex-PCR in identifying pathogens from positive blood cultures during bloodstream infections.
  • Retrospective review of all BioFire BCID2 tests on signal-positive blood cultures over twenty-two months.
  • Classified results as single-pathogen-positive, polymicrobial-positive, or negative.
  • Conducted a direct-cost analysis at €250 per test.
  • 401 out of 498 runs (80.5%) identified at least one pathogen; 330 were single-pathogen positives.
  • Primary pathogens included Staphylococcus spp., Escherichia coli, and the Klebsiella pneumoniae group.
  • Total reagent costs were €124,500, with €24,250 spent on negative results.

Cite This Study

Lupo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5f0bc586a4235cc161953dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16142252
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share