Review examines hydraulic fracturing applications in energy systems, highlighting environmental trade-offs and sustainability implications.
The transition to low-carbon energy systems is expanding the use of subsurface resources for heat extraction, energy storage, carbon management, and infrastructure reuse. This review examines hydraulic fracturing as a context-dependent engineering intervention across enhanced geothermal systems, geothermal reuse of depleted reservoirs and wells, unconventional gas, underground hydrogen storage, CO2-based subsurface engineering, and natural hydrogen. We synthesize how stimulation can improve permeability, connectivity, heat exchange, injectivity, and deliverability, while evaluating constraints related to water use, induced seismicity, leakage, well and caprock integrity, life-cycle emissions, and public acceptance. The central trade-off is that higher stimulation efficiency does not necessarily produce greater sustainability. Short-term gains in flow or energy delivery can increase long-term risks to containment, thermal performance, seismic safety, and environmental accountability. Evidence is strongest for enhanced geothermal systems and commercial unconventional gas, whereas field support remains limited for porous-media hydrogen storage, CO2-based fracturing, and natural hydrogen. Responsible deployment therefore requires site-specific boundaries, real-time monitoring, multi-physics and data-driven modeling, life-cycle assessment, and adaptive governance. Hydraulic fracturing can enable selected sustainable subsurface applications, but its value depends on balancing engineering performance against long-term environmental and integrity constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: