Evaluates imaging techniques for predicting outcomes in multiple myeloma patients, indicating the importance of PET/CT.
Background Post-therapy assessment of paraskeletal plasmacytoma (PM) in multiple myeloma (MM) relies on lesion persistence and/or size changes on whole-body low-dose CT (WBLDCT). Purpose To evaluate the prognostic value of WBLDCT and 18 F-FDG-PET/CT (PET/CT) before and after therapy in newly diagnosed MM patients with PM, and a small subgroup with solitary plasmacytoma (PSO), aiming to refine future imaging response criteria. Methods We retrospectively reviewed PET/CT and WBLDCT images of 42 patients (39 MM, 3 PSO) undergoing first-line therapy from October 27, 2016, to June 12, 2021. Imaging including criteria were a positive PET/CT scan at baseline and a subsequent negative PET/CT scan prior to starting maintenance. Negative PET/CT was defined applying Deauville criteria for focal, PM, and bone marrow uptake, with complete metabolic response defined as uptake below liver background (Deauville scores < 4). PET parameters (IMPeTUs criteria), CT morphological/technical features, and baseline laboratory data were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses for their impact on clinical outcomes. Results Pre-maintenance SUVmax of the PM lesions predicted adverse progression-free survival (PFS) and Deauville Score 3 identified patients with significantly worse PFS (median 27 months vs. not reached; HR = 3.45, p = 0.05) and showed a trend toward inferior overall survival (OS) (52 months vs. not reached; HR = 2.99, p = 0.16), remaining an independent prognostic factor. In transplanted patients ( n = 32), PM Deauville Score 3 predicted inferior PFS (median 27 vs. 74 months, p = 0.015) and OS (39 months vs. not reached, p = 0.03). CT had limited prognostic value, except for pre-maintenance transverse diameter (PFS: HR = 1.86, p = 0.02) and absence of cortical bone regeneration. Conclusions Pre-maintenance PM Deauville Score 3 has been shown to be representative of adverse outcomes, highlighting the added prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT over WBLDCT alone, and the possibility of refining future PET monitoring in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bezzi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: