Key result
Lower adiponectin levels were observed a decade before type 2 diabetes diagnosis (median 7,141 vs. 8,818 ng/mL at baseline, P<0.0001), with steeper declines in female and early-onset cases.
Why the study?
Do adiponectin trajectories differ before type 2 diabetes diagnosis compared to non-diabetic controls?
Case-Control (n=2,809)
Do adiponectin trajectories differ before type 2 diabetes diagnosis compared to non-diabetic controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 7141% vs 8818%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Lower adiponectin levels are present up to a decade before type 2 diabetes diagnosis, with sex-specific differences in trajectories over time.
Adiponectin may mark preclinical diabetes risk; leaves open its added value for prediction beyond established factors in prospective cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: The role of adiponectin in the natural history of diabetes is not well characterized. We set out to characterize prediagnosis trajectories of adiponectin in individuals who develop type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a case-cohort study (335 incident diabetes case and 2,474 noncase subjects) nested in the Whitehall II study, serum adiponectin was measured up to three times per participant (1991-1993, 1997-1999, and 2003-2004). Multilevel models adjusted for age and ethnicity were fitted to assess 13-year trajectories of log-transformed adiponectin preceding diabetes diagnosis or a randomly selected time point during follow-up (year(0)) based on 755/5,095 (case/noncase) person-examinations. RESULTS: Adiponectin levels were lower in diabetes case than in noncase subjects (median 7,141 [interquartile range 5,187-10,304] vs. 8,818 [6,535-12,369] ng/mL at baseline, P < 0.0001). Control subjects showed a modest decline in adiponectin throughout follow-up (0.3% per year, P < 0.0001) at higher levels in women than in men (difference at year(0): 5,358 ng/mL, P < 0.0001). Female case and early-onset case (age at diagnosis <52 years) subjects had a steeper decline than control subjects (slope difference -1.1% per year, P = 0.001 in females, -1.6% per year in early-onset case subjects, P = 0.034). In men, adiponectin slopes for case and noncase subjects were parallel. The slope differences by diabetes onset were largely attenuated after adjustment for changes in obesity, whereas the sex-specific slope differences were independent of obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Lower adiponectin levels were observed already a decade before the diagnosis of diabetes. The marked sex difference in trajectories suggests that sex-specific mechanisms affect the association between adiponectin levels and diabetes development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabák et al. (2012) conducted a case-control in Type 2 Diabetes (n=2,809). Adiponectin levels vs. Noncase subjects was evaluated on Baseline adiponectin levels (ng/mL) (p=<0.0001). Lower adiponectin levels were observed a decade before type 2 diabetes diagnosis (median 7,141 vs. 8,818 ng/mL at baseline, P<0.0001), with steeper declines in female and early-onset cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: