Key result
Left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular AF and prior ICH resulted in an annualized stroke/TIA rate of 1.8%, which was lower than the predicted rate of 7.0%.
Why the study?
OAC is relatively contraindicated after ICH if the cause cannot be eliminated, leaving AF patients at high risk of thromboembolism, making endovascular LAAC a potential alternative.
Does endovascular left atrial appendage closure reduce the rate of stroke or TIA compared to predicted rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and prior intracranial hemorrhage?
Cohort (n=138)
No
Does endovascular left atrial appendage closure reduce the rate of stroke or TIA compared to predicted rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and prior intracranial hemorrhage?
Endovascular left atrial appendage closure is associated with a lower-than-predicted rate of stroke and TIA in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and prior intracranial hemorrhage, offering a feasible alternative to oral anticoagulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LAAC may support stroke prevention in AF with prior ICH; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials before practice change.
BackgroundOral anticoagulation (OAC) is deemed a relative contraindication after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) if the cause cannot be eliminated and the risk of recurrence is high. That leaves atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of thromboembolic events. Endovascular left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) can be an alternative to OAC for patients requiring stroke prevention.MethodsWe performed a retrospective single-centre analysis of 138 consecutive ICH patients with nonvalvular AF and high stroke risk who underwent LAAC between 2010 and 2022 at Vancouver General Hospital. We report the baseline characteristics, procedural results, and follow-up data, comparing the observed stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) rate with the predicted event rate based on their CHA2DS2-VASc scores.ResultsThe average age was 76.1 ± 8.5 years; the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.4 ± 1.5; and the mean HAS-BLED score was 3.7 ± 0.9. The procedural success rate was 98.6%, and the complication rate was 3.6% with no periprocedural death, stroke, or TIA. The antithrombotic regimen post-LAAC consisted of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (1-6 months) followed by aspirin alone for a minimum of 6 months in 86.2%. At mean follow-up of 14.7 ± 13.7 months, 9 deaths (6.5%, 7 cardiovascular, 2 noncardiovascular), 2 strokes (1.4%), and 1 TIA (0.7%) had occurred. The annualized observed stroke/TIA rate was 1.8%, which was lower than the adjusted predicted stroke rate of 7.0% (95% confidence interval: 4.8%-9.2%). Two patients (1.5%) suffered another ICH (both on aspirin monotherapy). One device-related thrombus (0.7%) was confirmed and treated with OAC without sequelae.ConclusionEndovascular LAAC is a feasible alternative to OAC for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF and prior ICH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilhofer et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and prior intracranial hemorrhage (n=138). Endovascular left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) vs. Predicted event rate based on CHA2DS2-VASc scores was evaluated on Annualized stroke/TIA rate. Left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular AF and prior ICH resulted in an annualized stroke/TIA rate of 1.8%, which was lower than the predicted rate of 7.0%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: