Key result
Combining left atrial appendage closure with indefinite oral anticoagulation in patients with AF and recurrent strokes resulted in 1 transient ischaemic attack and 0 major bleeds over 17.4 months.
Why the study?
There are no recommendations on how to treat cardioembolic recurrent strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation who are well anticoagulated.
Does combining oral anticoagulation with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure prevent recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and recurrent strokes despite good anticoagulation?
Observational (n=19)
Does combining oral anticoagulation with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure prevent recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and recurrent strokes despite good anticoagulation?
Combining left atrial appendage closure with indefinite oral anticoagulation appears safe and may prevent recurrent events in atrial fibrillation patients who suffer recurrent strokes despite adequate anticoagulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support combined OAC and LAAC in recurrent stroke despite anticoagulation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Background and purpose There are no recommendations regarding how to treat cardioembolic recurrent strokes when patients are well anticoagulated. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining oral anticoagulation (OAC) with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with well‐anticoagulated atrial fibrillation (AF) with recurrent strokes. Methods In an explorative, prospective, observational study, LAAC was performed in patients with AF with at least two ischaemic strokes in the previous year, despite good anticoagulation using the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA) or Amulet Abbot device (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). We recorded age, type of AF, CHA2DS2‐VASC and HAS‐BLED scores, types of OAC and risk factors. After closure, treatment with aspirin (100 mg/day) was continued for 3 months in combination with indefinite OAC. Clinical status, recurrent embolisms and bleeding complications were recorded during follow‐up. Results A total of 19 patients were included (mean age, 72.1 ± 9.6 years; mean CHA2DS2‐VASC score, 5.3 ± 1.48; mean number of previous strokes, 2.78 ± 1.15). Thirteen had spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and all had dilatation of the left atrium. Eighteen patients had a multilobulated left atrial appendage, 17 with ‘chicken‐wing’ morphology and one patient had a left atrial appendage thrombus. There were no complications during the procedure. Only one patient had a transient ischaemic attack and no major bleeding occurred during a mean follow‐up of 17.4 ± 11.5 months. Conclusion Combination therapy with indefinite OAC plus LAAC in patients with AF with recurrent strokes despite good anticoagulation should be considered in order to prevent a new stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masjuán et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation with recurrent strokes (n=19). Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) combined with indefinite oral anticoagulation (OAC) was evaluated on Clinical status, recurrent embolisms and bleeding complications. Combining left atrial appendage closure with indefinite oral anticoagulation in patients with AF and recurrent strokes resulted in 1 transient ischaemic attack and 0 major bleeds over 17.4 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: