Key result
Machine learning model using clinical variables and symptoms predicts severe CAD with an AUC of 0.75.
Why the study?
Coronary angiography is invasive and expensive, and many patients suspected of coronary artery disease who undergo the procedure have no coronary lesions.
Can machine learning algorithms using symptoms and clinical variables accurately predict severe coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,602)
No
Can machine learning algorithms using symptoms and clinical variables accurately predict severe coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.75
Machine learning models utilizing routine clinical and symptom data can effectively predict severe coronary artery disease, potentially helping to avoid unnecessary invasive coronary angiography.
Introduction: Coronary angiography (CAG) is invasive and expensive, while numbers of patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CAG results have no coronary lesions. Aim: To develop machine learning algorithms using symptoms and clinical variables to predict CAD. Material and methods: This study was conducted as a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing CAG. We randomly chose 2082 patients from 2602 patients suspected of CAD as the training set, and 520 patients as the test set. We utilized LASSO regression to do feature selection. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix of different thresholds, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were shown. Support vector machine algorithm performances in 10 folds were conducted in the training set for detecting severe CAD, while XGBoost algorithm performances were conducted in the test set for detecting severe CAD. Results: The algorithm of logistic regression achieved an average AUC of 0.77 in the training set during 10-fold validation and an AUC of 0.75 in the test set. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.1, 11 patients in the test set (520 patients) were screened out, and NPV reached 90.9%. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.2, 110 patients in the test set were screened out, and reached 83.6%. Meanwhile, when threshold was set to 0.9, PPV reached 97.4%. When the threshold was set to 0.8, PPV reached 91.5%. Conclusions: Machine learning algorithm using data from hospital information systems could assist in severe CAD exclusion and confirmation, and thus help patients avoid unnecessary CAG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=2,602). Machine learning model (Logistic Regression) using symptoms and clinical variables vs. Coronary angiography (gold standard) was evaluated on Prediction of severe obstructive coronary artery disease (AUC 0.75). A logistic regression machine learning model using clinical variables and symptoms achieved an AUC of 0.75 in the test set for predicting severe coronary artery disease on angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: