Key result
Higher CAC scores strongly linked to more severe angiographic abnormalities, unlike exercise ECG.
Why the study?
The CAC score can adjust CAD likelihood, but its performance needed to be compared with PTP, exercise ECG, and coronary angiography in symptomatic patients.
Does the coronary artery calcium score improve the diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease compared to pre-test probability and exercise ECG in symptomatic patients?
Observational (n=882)
Does the coronary artery calcium score improve the diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease compared to pre-test probability and exercise ECG in symptomatic patients?
Effect estimate: Cramer's V 0.43
p-value: p=<0.0001
CAC may refine CAD assessment in symptomatic patients; leaves open superiority to exercise ECG or PTP in prospective studies.
Background: The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score can be used to increase (CAC score > 0) or decrease (CAC score = 0) the likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD). We compared the CAC score with the pre-test probability (PTP) for CAD (low, intermediate, and high). Furthermore, we compared the CAC score with exercise electrocardiography (ECG) and compared both tests with coronary angiography. Methods and Results: We retrospectively identified patients with angina and/or dyspnea for whom CAC score was used to increase or decrease the likelihood of CAD. Of 882 patients, majority had low (45%) or intermediate (44%) PTP. Patients with higher PTP had significantly higher CAC scores (Cramer’s V = 0.29, p < 0.0001). Most patients (57%) had a CAC score of zero, especially those with low (73%) and intermediate (49%) PTP. However, 20% of patients with high PTP had CAC score of zero. Higher CAC scores were observed in patients with abnormal exercise ECG, but association was weak and not significant (Cramer’s V = 0.13, p = 0.08). Moreover, more than 40% of patients with an abnormal exercise ECG had CAC score of zero. Higher CAC scores were associated with more severe abnormalities on coronary angiography (Cramer’s V = 0.43, p < 0.0001), whereas there was no association between results of exercise ECG and coronary angiography (Cramer’s V = 0.11, p = 0.91). Conclusion: CAC score can be used in addition to PTP to increase or decrease the likelihood of CAD, and it might be more useful than exercise ECG in the diagnostic work-up of chest pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Witvliet et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Symptomatic chronic coronary syndrome (n=882). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score vs. Exercise electrocardiography (ECG) and pre-test probability was evaluated on Association with severe abnormalities on coronary angiography (Cramer's V 0.43, p=<0.0001). Higher coronary artery calcium scores were significantly associated with more severe abnormalities on coronary angiography (Cramer’s V = 0.43, p < 0.0001), unlike exercise ECG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: