Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study compares outcomes of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism in pediatric patients, highlighting significant risk factors.
OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare patient and event characteristics and outcomes in pediatric massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) and submassive pulmonary embolism (SMPE). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at a quaternary-care pediatric hospital was conducted. Patients age <19 years with MPE (acute pulmonary embolism [PE] with cardiac arrest, hypotension, or compensated shock due to PE) or SMPE (right ventricular strain due to acute PE) between January 1997 and June 2019 were included. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were identified, including 9 (27%) patients with MPE and 24 (73%) patients with SMPE. The most commonly identified risk factor was use of oral contraceptive pills in 16 (49%) patients. Six (18%) patients died, 3 (9%) of which were PE-related deaths. Before PE, patients with MPE were more likely to be hospitalized (89% vs 13%, P < .001), have major comorbidities (89% vs 25%, P = .002), central venous catheters (67% vs 17%, P = .01), critical illness (56% vs 8%, P = .009), immobility (67% vs 13%, P = .005), and be postoperative (44% vs 4%, P = .01). MPE patients were also more likely to die before discharge (56% vs 4%, P = .003). Both groups were equally likely to have primary reperfusion attempts (78% of MPE versus 67% of SMPE, P = .69). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric MPE and SMPE differed in presentation, comorbidities, and risk factors, many of which were associated with hospitalization status. Pediatric-specific studies are warranted to determine risk assessment and management strategies, which may differ from adult guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: