Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel endothelin antagonists inhibit ETA receptor binding, suggesting implications for vascular physiology.
The novel endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists BE-18257A and BE-18257B were isolated from the fermentation products of Streptomyces misakiensis. The above-mentioned compounds inhibited [125I]ET-1 binding to ETA receptors (selective for ET-1) on porcine aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) with IC50 values of 1.4 and 0.47 microM, respectively. [125I]ET-1 binding to ETB receptors (nonselective to ET isopeptides) in cerebellar membranes was not inhibited by either of these compounds even at 100 microM. The synthesized analogue BQ-123 induced extremely potent inhibition of [125I]ET-1 binding to ETA receptors (IC50 of 7.3 nM), but it barely inhibited [125I]ET-1 binding to ETB receptors (IC50 of 18 microM) and binding of various other peptides to their receptors. BQ-123 shifted the concentration-response curve for ET-1 toward the right in porcine isolated coronary arteries, indicative of competitive antagonism for the ETA receptor. However, there was a small amount of BQ-123-insensitive vasoconstriction that paralleled the incomplete inhibition of [125I]ET-1 binding in the membrane of the vascular smooth muscle layer. These data suggest that the artery contracts via both ETA and ETB receptors and that BQ-123 selectively inhibits ETA-mediated contraction. Furthermore, BQ-123 revealed large tissue and species differences in the distribution of ETA receptors. Thus, the potent ETA antagonist BQ-123 should be useful in clarifying the (patho)physiological roles of ETA receptors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ihara et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: