Key result
Transvenous lead extraction using non-powered mechanical sheaths achieved complete procedural success in 96.13% and clinical success in 98.93% of patients, with a 2.20% major complication rate.
Why the study?
Transvenous lead extraction is the preferred strategy for managing cardiac implantable electronic device complications, but it can sometimes cause serious complications.
Does transvenous lead extraction using non-powered mechanical sheaths provide high procedural success with acceptable safety in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Cohort (n=1,500)
Yes
Does transvenous lead extraction using non-powered mechanical sheaths provide high procedural success with acceptable safety in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Transvenous lead extraction using non-powered mechanical sheaths is highly successful and safe, though worsening tricuspid regurgitation remains a notable complication.
High TLE success with non-powered sheaths supports experienced-center use; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the preferred management strategy for complications related to cardiac implantable electronic devices. TLE sometimes can cause serious complications. Methods: Outcomes of TLE procedures using non-powered mechanical sheaths were analyzed in 1500 patients (mean age 68.11 years; 39.86% females) admitted to two high-volume centers. Results: Complete procedural success was achieved in 96.13% of patients; clinical success in 98.93%, no periprocedural death occurred. Mean lead dwell time in the study population was 112.1 months. Minor complications developed in 115 (7.65%), major complications in 33 (2.20%) patients. The most frequent minor complications were tricuspid valve damage (TVD) (3.20%) and pericardial effusion that did not necessitate immediate intervention (1.33%). The most common major complication was cardiac laceration/vascular tear (1.40%) followed by an increase in TVD by two or three grades to grade 4 (0.80%). Conclusions: Despite the long implant duration (112.1 months) satisfying results without procedure-related death can be obtained using mechanical tools. Lead remnants or severe tricuspid regurgitation was the principal cause of lack of clinical and procedural success. Worsening TR(Tricuspid regurgitation) (due to its long-term consequences), but not cardiac/vascular wall damage; is still the biggest TLE-related problem; when non-powered mechanical sheaths are used as first-line tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tułecki et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Complications related to cardiac implantable electronic devices (n=1,500). Transvenous lead extraction using non-powered mechanical sheaths was evaluated on Complete procedural success. Transvenous lead extraction using non-powered mechanical sheaths achieved complete procedural success in 96.13% and clinical success in 98.93% of patients, with a 2.20% major complication rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: