Key result
Avatrombopag is linked to ~98% of chronic liver disease patients avoiding platelet transfusions.
Why the study?
Patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia face increased periprocedural bleeding risk, while prophylactic platelet transfusions have limitations including lack of efficacy and transfusion-associated reactions.
Does avatrombopag improve platelet counts and reduce platelet transfusions in patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia undergoing a procedure?
Cohort (n=50)
Does avatrombopag improve platelet counts and reduce platelet transfusions in patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia undergoing a procedure?
Avatrombopag is effective and well-tolerated for increasing platelet counts and avoiding prophylactic platelet transfusions in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Avatrombopag was associated with platelet increases and low transfusion rates; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The phase 4 observational cohort study assessed the effectiveness and safety of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist avatrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and thrombocytopenia undergoing a procedure. Patients with CLD may have thrombocytopenia, increasing the risk of periprocedural bleeding. Prophylactic platelet transfusions used to reduce this risk have limitations including lack of efficacy and transfusion-associated reactions. Prophylactic thrombopoietin receptor agonists have been shown to increase platelet counts and decrease platelet transfusions. Effectiveness was assessed by change from baseline in platelet count and proportion of patients needing a platelet transfusion. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs). Of 50 patients enrolled, 48 were unique patients and 2 patients were enrolled twice for separate procedures. The mean (standard deviation) change in platelet count from baseline to procedure day was 41.1 × 109/L (33.29 × 109/L, n = 38), returning to near baseline at the post-procedure visit (change from baseline -1.9 × 109/L [15.03 × 109/L], n = 11). The proportion of patients not requiring a platelet transfusion after baseline and up to 7 days following the procedure was 98% (n = 49). Serious AEs were infrequent (n = 2 [4%]). No treatment-emergent AEs were considered related to avatrombopag. There were 2 mild bleeding events, no thromboembolic events or deaths, and no patients received rescue procedures (excluding transfusions). This study found that in a real-world setting, treatment with avatrombopag was well tolerated, increased the mean platelet count by procedure day, and reduced the need for intraoperative platelet transfusions in patients with CLD and thrombocytopenia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satapathy et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia (n=50). Avatrombopag was evaluated on Change from baseline in platelet count and proportion of patients needing a platelet transfusion. Avatrombopag increased mean platelet count by 41.1 × 10^9/L by procedure day, and 98% of patients with chronic liver disease did not require a platelet transfusion.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: