Key result
Guideline-adherent coronary angiography is linked to an absolute ~27-point higher revascularization rate.
Why the study?
Prospective German data were lacking regarding the degree of guideline adherence in using coronary angiography for non-AMI patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected ACS.
What is the rate of guideline-adherent coronary angiography in emergency department patients with suspected ACS without AMI, and does adherence correlate with subsequent revascularization?
Cohort (n=229)
Yes
What is the rate of guideline-adherent coronary angiography in emergency department patients with suspected ACS without AMI, and does adherence correlate with subsequent revascularization?
Guideline-adherent use of coronary angiography for suspected ACS without AMI effectively enriches for patients requiring therapeutic revascularization, highlighting the clinical utility of adherence to established diagnostic pathways.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enrich revascularization selection in suspected ACS without AMI; hypothesis-generating in this observational cohort.
Background: For patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), direct coronary angiography (CA) is recommended, while for non-AMI patients, the diagnostic work-up depends on clinical criteria. This analysis provides initial prospective German data for the degree of guideline-adherence (GL) in the use of CA on non-AMI patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) according to the 2015 ESC-ACS-GL. Furthermore the implications of the application of the 2020 ESC-ACS-GL recommendations were evaluated. Methods: Patient symptoms were identified using a standardized questionnaire; medical history and diagnostic work-up were acquired from health records. In accordance with the 2015 ESC-ACS-GL, CA was considered GL-adherent if intermediate risk criteria (IRC) were present or non-invasive, image-guided testing (NIGT) was pathological. Results: Between January 2019 and August 2021, 229 patients were recruited across seven centers. Patients presented with chest pain, dyspnea, and other symptoms in 66.7%, 16.2% and 17.1%, respectively, were in mean 66.3 ± 10.5 years old, and 36.3% were female. In accordance with the 2015 ESC-ACS-GL, the use of CA was GL-adherent for 64.0% of the patients. GL-adherent compared to non-adherent use of CA resulted in revascularization more often (44.5% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.001). Applying the 2020 ESC-ACS-GL, 20.4% of CA would remain GL-adherent. Conclusions: In the majority of cases, the use of CA was adherent to the 2015 ESC-ACS-GL. With regard to the 2020 and 2023 ESC-ACS-GL, efforts to expand the utilization of NIGT are crucial, especially as GL-adherent use of CA is more likely to result in revascularization.(German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00015638; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00015638; (registration date: 19 February 2019)).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wein et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Suspected acute coronary syndrome without acute myocardial infarction (n=229). Guideline-adherent coronary angiography (2015 ESC-ACS-GL) vs. Non-guideline-adherent coronary angiography was evaluated on Revascularization (p=<0.001). Guideline-adherent use of coronary angiography was associated with a higher rate of subsequent revascularization compared to non-adherent use.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: