Key result
FlowTriever aspiration thrombectomy in high-risk acute pulmonary embolism patients achieved successful clot removal in 94.1% of patients and significantly improved cardiac index (p=0.01).
Why the study?
The FlowTriever thrombectomy system reduces right ventricle strain in acute submassive pulmonary embolism, but had not been studied in higher-risk pulmonary embolism patients.
Does percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy improve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in patients with massive and very high-risk submassive acute pulmonary embolism?
Observational (n=34)
Yes
Does percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy improve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in patients with massive and very high-risk submassive acute pulmonary embolism?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FlowTriever thrombectomy appears feasible in high-risk PE; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before clinical adoption.
Objective Examine FlowTriever thrombectomy feasibility in high‐risk PE patients. Background The FlowTriever thrombectomy system (Inari Medical, Irvine, CA) can reduce right ventricle (RV) strain in acute submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) patients. This technology has not been studied in higher risk PE patients. Methods This multicenter retrospective analysis included patients treated with FlowTriever between 2017 and 2019 if they met at least one of the following: vasopressor dependence, PE induced respiratory failure, or decreased cardiac index (CI) measured by right heart catheterization. Results Analysis included 34 patients: 18 massive, four intubated, 12 normotensive but with CI < 1.8. Average age was 56 and their median simplified PE severity index was 2. Patients had high bleeding risk, with 13 having recent surgery, six posttrauma, and four recent strokes. Six patients received cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and two received additional mechanical circulatory support. All patients had RV dilatation and elevated biomarkers. Clot removal was successful in 32/34 patients. CI improved from 2.0 ± 0.1 L/min/m 2 before thrombectomy to 2.4 ± 0.1 L/min/m 2 after ( p = .01). The mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 33.2 ± 1.6 mmHg to 25.0 ± 1.5 mmHg ( p = .01). The two patients—both with no or minimal thrombus removed—deteriorated during the procedure: one died and the other was successfully stabilized on ECMO. There were no other major complications. All other patients were alive at the time of data collection (mean follow‐up of 205 days). Conclusion Aspiration thrombectomy appears feasible in higher risk acute PE patients with immediate hemodynamic improvement and low in‐hospital mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toma et al. (2020) conducted an observational in massive and very high-risk submassive acute pulmonary embolism (n=34). FlowTriever thrombectomy was evaluated on Clot removal success. FlowTriever aspiration thrombectomy in high-risk acute pulmonary embolism patients achieved successful clot removal in 94.1% of patients and significantly improved cardiac index (p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: