Key result
Higher visceral adiposity index is linked to ~10% higher odds of type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
The relationship of fat mass index and visceral adiposity index to incident type 2 diabetes has not been established.
Are visceral adiposity index (VAI) and fat mass index (FMI) predictive of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=8,411)
No
Are visceral adiposity index (VAI) and fat mass index (FMI) predictive of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults?
Both VAI and FMI demonstrate a weak association with type 2 diabetes mellitus, suggesting they may not be strong independent predictive tools compared to established historical risk factors.
Background: Indices, based on anthropometrics with or without non-anthropometric components, are predictive of cardio-metabolic outcomes. Fat mass index (FMI) is similar to BMI except measured fat mass replaces body weight. The visceral adiposity index (VAI) combines anthropometric measures with lipid measurements TG/HDL. The relationship of these indices to incident type 2 diabetes (T2DM) has not been established. Therefore, we have evaluated the predictive power and optimal cut-off points of FMI, and VAI with T2DM in a cross-sectional population study. Methods: These population-based cross-sectional study comprised 8411 adults aged 35-65 years using data from the Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) cohort. VAI and FMI were defined as previously published. Optimal cut-off points for association with incident T2DM were determined from receiver-operating curves (ROC). Results: The optimal cut-off point for VAI was 4.86 (AUC: 0.673; 95% CI: 0.65-0.69) and FMI 9.3 (AUC: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.55-0.59), and for T2DM in our study population. The odds ratios (OR) for T2DM were nearly identical, for VAI 1.098 (95% CI: 1.08-1.11) and for FMI 1.08 (95% CI: 1.05-1.10). Conclusions: In the current population study, VAI and FMI were weakly associated with T2DM. Therefore, it seems that anthropometric measures are unlikely to be strong mediators of T2DM compared to historical and other factors in the population studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagheri et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=8,411). Visceral adiposity index (VAI) and Fat mass index (FMI) vs. Below optimal cut-off points was evaluated on Type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR 1.098, 95% CI 1.08-1.11). Higher visceral adiposity index (VAI) and fat mass index (FMI) were weakly associated with increased odds of type 2 diabetes mellitus, with VAI showing an odds ratio of 1.098.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: