Key result
Relevant coronary collateral flow in patients with first acute myocardial infarction was associated with a significantly smaller final infarct size (7% vs. 20%, p<0.001) at 12 weeks.
Why the study?
Coronary collateral flow on angiography is linked to lower mortality in CAD, but understanding of the underlying mechanisms remains sparse.
Does relevant coronary collateral flow improve myocardial salvage and left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=36)
Does relevant coronary collateral flow improve myocardial salvage and left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 20%
p-value: p=< 0.001
In patients with a first AMI undergoing PCI, the presence of relevant coronary collaterals is associated with significantly smaller final infarct size and better recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction at 12 weeks.
Relevant collaterals may boost salvage and cut HF risk post-first AMI; extends prior data with serial CMR quantification.
Background: Coronary collateral flow in angiography has been linked with lower mortality rates in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the relevance of the underlying mechanism is sparse. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), relevant coronary collateral flow is associated with more salvaged myocardium and lower risk of developing heart failure. Methods and Results: Patients with first AMI who received a percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 h after symptom onset were classified visually by assigning a Cohen–Rentrop Score (CRS) ranging between 0 (no collaterals) and 3 (complete retrograde filling of the occluded vessel). All 36 patients included in the analysis underwent cardiac magnetic resonance examination within 3 to 5 days after myocardial infarction and after 12 weeks. Patients with relevant collateral flow (CRS 2–3) to the infarct-related artery had significantly smaller final infarct size compared to those without (7 ± 4% vs. 20 ± 12%, p < 0.001). In addition, both groups showed improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction early after AMI, whereas the recovery was greater in CRS 2–3 (+8 ± 5% vs. +3 ± 5%, p = 0.015). Conclusion: In patients with first AMI, relevant collateral flow to the infarct-related artery was associated with more salvaged myocardium at 12 weeks, translating into greater improvement of systolic left ventricular function. The protective effect of coronary collaterals and the variance of infarct location should be further investigated in larger studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pěč et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=36). Relevant coronary collateral flow (Cohen-Rentrop Score 2-3) vs. No relevant collateral flow was evaluated on Final infarct size (p=< 0.001). Relevant coronary collateral flow in patients with first acute myocardial infarction was associated with a significantly smaller final infarct size (7% vs. 20%, p<0.001) at 12 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: