Key result
Angle correction parallel to color Doppler blood flow yielded a mean difference in peak systolic velocity of -17.2 cm/s at the stenosis compared to parallel to the artery wall (P<0.008).
Why the study?
The study sought to compare internal carotid artery Doppler peak systolic velocities measured with angle correction parallel to the artery wall versus parallel to blood flow direction on color Doppler.
Does angle correction parallel to blood flow compared to parallel to the artery wall improve consistency of Doppler peak systolic velocity measurements in internal carotid artery stenosis?
Observational (n=23)
Does angle correction parallel to blood flow compared to parallel to the artery wall improve consistency of Doppler peak systolic velocity measurements in internal carotid artery stenosis?
Angle correction parallel to the color Doppler blood flow lumen provides more consistent velocity measurements downstream from a stenosis than correction parallel to the artery wall.
PSV measurements in carotid stenosis may vary by angle-correction method; leaves open standardization and outcome validation.
OBJECTIVES: We compared internal carotid artery Doppler peak systolic velocities (PSVs) measured with angle correction parallel to the artery wall (// wall) on grayscale images and parallel to the direction of blood flow (// flow) on color Doppler images. METHODS: We studied 25 internal carotid lesions with PSVs higher than 125 cm/s. The PSVs were measured in the same imaging plane, at the stenosis orifice (0 cm) and at 0.5 and 1 cm downstream by both methods. Linear regression and correlation analyses were used to study the effects of the angle correction method on changes in PSVs as a function of the differences in angle adjustment and distance from the stenosis. RESULTS: The 23 patients studied included 9 women and 14 men. There was a mean difference in absolute PSVs ± SD of -17.2 ± 29.5 cm/s (P < .008) between methods at the stenosis. The difference in the PSVs was associated with the angle difference between the flow jet and the artery wall (P < .01). At 1 cm from the stenosis, // flow PSVs were more strongly correlated with PSVs at the stenosis (r = 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.28, 0.82; P = .001) than // wall PSVs (r = 0.39; 95% confidence interval, -0.003, 0.68; P = .052). CONCLUSIONS: Blood flow velocity measurements made with angle correction parallel to the direction of the color Doppler blood flow lumen remain more consistent with the distance from the stenosis than blood flow velocity measurements made with angle correction parallel to the outer artery walls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polak et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Internal carotid artery stenosis (n=23). Angle correction parallel to the direction of blood flow on color Doppler images vs. Angle correction parallel to the artery wall on grayscale images was evaluated on Difference in absolute peak systolic velocities (PSVs) at the stenosis (MD -17.2 cm/s, p=< .008). Angle correction parallel to color Doppler blood flow yielded a mean difference in peak systolic velocity of -17.2 cm/s at the stenosis compared to parallel to the artery wall (P<0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: