Key result
Despite the use of more potent antiplatelet therapies, the residual risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke up to 1 year after acute coronary syndromes remains high.
There remains a significant residual ischemic risk in ACS patients despite contemporary dual antiplatelet therapy, highlighting the need for further secondary prevention strategies that balance ischemic benefit with bleeding risk.
During the past two decades, the use of antiplatelet therapies has been the focus of new studies of secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes, with more than 75% of patients in contemporary practice treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus a thienopyridine) on hospital discharge.1 Despite increases in the use of antiplatelet therapies and the development of more potent antiplatelet therapies (prasugrel and ticagrelor), the residual risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke up to 1 year after acute coronary syndromes remains high2,3 (Table 1). This represents a therapeutic challenge, since the balance between risk (major bleeding) and benefit . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roe et al. (2011) conducted an editorial in Acute Coronary Syndrome. Antiplatelet therapies was evaluated. Despite the use of more potent antiplatelet therapies, the residual risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke up to 1 year after acute coronary syndromes remains high.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: