Key result
Pericardial fat volume was significantly associated with coronary artery plaque eccentricity in men after adjusting for traditional risk factors (P<.01).
Why the study?
Is pericardial fat volume associated with coronary artery plaque eccentricity in an asymptomatic population?
Cohort (n=183)
Is pericardial fat volume associated with coronary artery plaque eccentricity in an asymptomatic population?
p-value: p=<.01
Pericardial fat volume is more strongly associated with coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden than BMI or waist circumference, supporting its proposed role in atherosclerosis.
Hypothesis-generating for pericardial fat in men; should not yet change risk assessment or practice.
PURPOSE: To determine the relationship of pericardial fat, which secretes proinflammatory markers that have been implicated in coronary atherosclerosis, with atherosclerotic plaque in an asymptomatic population-based cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved study, all participants supplied written informed consent. One hundred eighty-three participants (89 women, 94 men; mean age, 61 years ± 9 [standard deviation]) from the community-based Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) were included. The coronary artery eccentricity (ratio of maximal to minimal coronary artery wall thickness) was determined by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and served as an index of plaque burden. The pericardial fat volume was determined by using computed tomography. Linear regression coefficient analysis was used to correlate pericardial fat volume with coronary artery wall thickness and plaque eccentricity. RESULTS: Pericardial fat volume correlated significantly with degree of plaque eccentricity (P < .05) in both men and women. After adjustments for body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference, traditional risk factors, C-reactive protein level, and coronary artery calcium content, the relationship between pericardial fat and plaque eccentricity remained significant in men (P < .01) but not in women. BMI and waist circumference correlated with degree of plaque eccentricity in the univariate model (P < .05) but not after adjustment for pericardial fat volume or traditional risk factors. CONCLUSION: Pericardial fat volume, rather than BMI and waist circumference, was more strongly related to plaque eccentricity as a measure of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden. The results support the proposed role of pericardial fat in association with atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miao et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic coronary atherosclerosis (n=183). Pericardial fat volume was evaluated on Coronary artery eccentricity (index of plaque burden) (p=<.01). Pericardial fat volume was significantly associated with coronary artery plaque eccentricity in men after adjusting for traditional risk factors (P<.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: