Key result
Phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance accurately measured mitral flow-derived stroke volume compared to cine CMR with a mean difference of 3.6 μL and successfully detected disease-related flow alterations.
Why the study?
Does three-directional phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance accurately evaluate mitral flow compared to echocardiography and cine CMR in a rat model of cardiac disease?
Does three-directional phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance accurately evaluate mitral flow compared to echocardiography and cine CMR in a rat model of cardiac disease?
PC-CMR offers accurate evaluation of three-directional mitral blood flow in rodents, successfully detecting alterations in response to cardiac disease and providing novel insight into flow characteristics.
PC-CMR enables three-directional mitral flow assessment in rodent models; hypothesis-generating for clinical translation.
PURPOSE: Determination of mitral flow is an important aspect in assessment of cardiac function. Traditionally, mitral flow is measured by Doppler echocardiography which suffers from several challenges, particularly related to the direction and the spatial inhomogeneity of flow. These challenges are especially prominent in rodents. The purpose of this study was to establish a cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol for evaluation of three-directional mitral flow in a rodent model of cardiac disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-directional mitral flow were evaluated by phase contrast CMR (PC-CMR) in rats with aortic banding (AB) (N = 7) and sham-operated controls (N = 7). Peak mitral flow and deceleration rate from PC-CMR was compared to conventional Doppler echocardiography. The accuracy of PC-CMR was investigated by comparison of spatiotemporally integrated mitral flow with left ventricular stroke volume assessed by cine CMR. RESULTS: PC-CMR portrayed the spatial distribution of mitral flow and flow direction in the atrioventricular plane throughout diastole. Both PC-CMR and echocardiography demonstrated increased peak mitral flow velocity and higher deceleration rate in AB compared to sham. Comparison with cine CMR revealed that PC-CMR measured mitral flow with excellent accuracy. Echocardiography presented significantly lower values of flow compared to PC-CMR. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we show that PC-CMR offers accurate evaluation of three-directional mitral blood flow in rodents. The method successfully detects alterations in the mitral flow pattern in response to cardiac disease and provides novel insight into the characteristics of mitral flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skårdal et al. (2016) studied Cardiac disease (aortic banding-induced heart failure) (n=14). Phase-Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (PC-CMR) vs. Cine CMR and Echocardiography was evaluated on Stroke volume measured by PC-CMR compared to cine CMR (MD 3.6 μL, 95% CI -8.8 to 16.0, p=0.54). Phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance accurately measured mitral flow-derived stroke volume compared to cine CMR with a mean difference of 3.6 μL and successfully detected disease-related flow alterations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: