Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research note analyzes emotions expressed in online comments about whale shark tourism, indicating its complex impacts.
Controversial wildlife tourism is shaped not only by on-site encounters but also by emotional appraisal through digital media. Whale shark tourism in Oslob, Cebu, has been widely studied in ecological, managerial, and participant-centered terms, but less is known about how remote viewers appraise it through unsolicited online commentary. Using Semantic Space Theory as a light analytic scaffold, this research note analyzes 7,808 YouTube comments through qualitative sentiment analysis and Phronetic Iterative Qualitative Data Analysis. The findings show a dual-trigger affective structure in which non-social emotions attach to two distinct appraisal objects: the vlogger as human mediator and the vlog as mediated artifact. The note contributes a bounded account of how digital spectatorship helps affirm, unsettle, or contest legitimacy in controversial wildlife tourism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: