Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) is an aggressive malignancy with poor patient outcomes. For most patients, the primary site remains elusive, limiting therapeutic options to non-specific chemotherapy. The CUP-COMP study (NCT04750109) assessed the feasibility of integrating molecular profiling with a National Molecular Tumour Board (MTB) into the treatment pathway of patients with CUP. Methods Patients with histologically confirmed CUP were recruited from seven UK sites. Blood- and/or tissue-based molecular profiling was performed with results interpreted via an MTB identifying potentially actionable alterations (PAA). Retrospective tissue and blood alteration analysis assessed concordance and utility. Results 113/117 patients recruited between June 2021 and February 2023 completed 12 months of follow-up. Of 115 patients with successful molecular profiling, blood-based profiling was more successful (93%) than tissue-based (61%). The MTB identified PAAs in 63% (73/115), with 26% (31/117) treated using a precision medicine (PM) approach. Primary tumours were subsequently confirmed/suspected in 41 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 months. Detecting a PAA in blood was impacted by tumour fraction (33% of patients had a tumour fraction <1%). Discussion CUP-COMP demonstrates liquid biopsies are highly feasible in CUP. While tissue profiling remains preferable, blood-based profiling offers a timely viable alternative to tissue, especially in selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conway et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: