Narrative review summarizes immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugate advancements in gynecologic cancers, suggesting future strategies.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody–drug conjugates have rapidly expanded treatment options for gynecologic malignancies, although the magnitude of benefit varies substantially across tumor types and biomarker-defined populations. This narrative review summarizes the biologic rationale, predictive biomarkers, pivotal clinical trials, regulatory approvals, guideline-supported strategies, and emerging directions for immune checkpoint blockade and antibody–drug conjugates in endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers. In endometrial cancer, molecular classification and mismatch repair status have transformed treatment selection, with PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade now integrated into first-line chemoimmunotherapy and recurrent disease management. HER2-directed and TROP-2-directed antibody–drug conjugates are also emerging as biomarker-directed strategies. In cervical cancer, human papillomavirus-driven tumor biology, PD-L1 expression, and tissue factor expression support the use of checkpoint inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, and therapeutic vaccine approaches across locally advanced and recurrent or metastatic settings. In ovarian cancer, single-agent checkpoint blockade has shown limited activity in unselected populations, but recent advances include biomarker-selected chemoimmunotherapy in platinum-resistant disease and clinically meaningful activity of folate receptor alpha-directed and HER2-directed antibody–drug conjugates. Across gynecologic cancers, key challenges include refining predictive biomarkers, optimizing sequencing after prior immunotherapy exposure, managing overlapping toxicities, and designing trials that enrich for biologically responsive subgroups. Future progress will depend on integrating molecular classification, immune contexture, ADC target expression, and patient-specific clinical factors into treatment selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: