Explores PD-1/PD-L1 signaling in lupus nephritis, suggesting tailored immunomodulation strategies.
BACKGROUND: The PD-1/PD-L1 axis is a key immune checkpoint that maintains peripheral tolerance by restraining T-cell activation. In lupus nephritis (LN), this pathway has long been viewed as protective, based on Pdcd1-deficient mice developing lupus-like nephritis and PD-L1 fusion protein efficacy in mouse models. However, recent clinical findings reveal a paradox: PD-1⁺ T cells - especially CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ subsets - are greatly expanded in blood and kidneys of LN patients, correlating with disease activity, proteinuria, and renal decline. OBJECTIVE: To reconcile the protective and pathogenic roles of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling and propose a unifying "signal balance model" for precision immunomodulation. FINDINGS: These PD-1⁺ cells are not exhausted but exhibit an activated, clonally expanded effector phenotype (granzyme B, perforin, IFN-γ) that drives tissue injury, while PD-1⁺ Tph and Tfh cells promote autoantibody production. The biphasic nature of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling arises from T-cell subset heterogeneity, inflammatory cytokines (IL-12, IFN-α) that override inhibition, costimulatory signals, and reverse signaling through PD-L1 on renal parenchymal cells. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the net outcome - protection versus pathogenesis - depends on the relative weights of these four determinants, further influenced by genetic background (e.g., PDCD1 polymorphisms). PD-1 agonism (rosnilimab, PD-L1-Fc, nanoparticle delivery) offers promise, but the pathogenic activity of PD-1⁺ effector T cells argues against a uniform approach. Our framework provides a basis for patient stratification, biomarker development, and combination strategies, ultimately guiding a shift from broad immunosuppression to tailored therapy in LN and informing future translational research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: