Key result
Moxifloxacin showed a greater effect on QTcF and J-T peak c in women, whereas levofloxacin had smaller effects in women, suggesting sex differences in ventricular repolarization.
Why the study?
Women have longer baseline QT intervals and higher proarrhythmic risk from QT-prolonging drugs, prompting characterization of electrophysiologic differences between moxifloxacin and levofloxacin across sexes.
Do moxifloxacin and levofloxacin have different effects on QT subintervals in men and women?
Do moxifloxacin and levofloxacin have different effects on QT subintervals in men and women?
Sex differences exist in the repolarization effects of fluoroquinolones, with moxifloxacin prolonging QT intervals more in women and levofloxacin having a lesser effect in women, highlighting the need for sex-specific cardiac safety assessments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Moxifloxacin's greater QT prolongation in women warrants sex-specific monitoring; extends TQT evidence for individualized repolarization risk assessment.
Women are associated with longer electrocardiographic QT intervals and increased proarrhythmic risks of QT‐prolonging drugs. The purpose of this study was to characterize the differences in cardiac electrophysiology between moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in men and women and to assess the balance of inward and outward currents through the analysis of QT subintervals. Data from 2 TQT studies were used to investigate the impact of moxifloxacin (400 mg) and levofloxacin (1000 and 1500 mg) on QT subintervals using algorithms for measurement of J‐T peak and T peak ‐T end intervals. Concentration‐effect analyses were performed to establish potential relationships between the ECG effects and the concentrations of the 2 fluoroquinolones. Moxifloxacin was shown to be a more potent prolonger of QT interval corrected by Fredericia (QTcF) and had a pronounced effect on J‐T peak c. Levofloxacin had little effect on J‐T peak c. For moxifloxacin, the concentration‐effect modeling showed a greater effect for women on QTcF and J‐T peak c, whereas for levofloxacin the inverse was true: women had smaller QTcF and J‐T peak c effects. The different patterns in repolarization after administration of both drugs suggested a sex difference, which may be related to the combined I Ks and I Kr inhibitory properties of moxifloxacin versus I Kr suppression only of levofloxacin. The equipotent inhibition of I Ks and I Kr appears to affect women more than men. Sex hormones are known to influence cardiac ion channel expression and differences in QT duration. Differences in I Kr and I Ks balances, influenced by sex hormones, may explain the results. These results support the impact of sex differences on the cardiac safety assessment of drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Täubel et al. (2019) studied this question. Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin vs. Men vs Women was evaluated on QT subintervals (QTcF and J-T peak c). Moxifloxacin showed a greater effect on QTcF and J-T peak c in women, whereas levofloxacin had smaller effects in women, suggesting sex differences in ventricular repolarization.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: