Key result
Only 17.65% of patients with a class-I indication for CABG underwent the procedure, with the main reasons for refusal being financial issues, high-risk profiles, and patient unwillingness.
Why the study?
Despite being an effective revascularization procedure, there is a downtrend in patients undergoing CABG, prompting this investigation into the responsible factors among those with multivessel disease and a clear indication.
Cross-Sectional (n=340)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite clear indications, a significant majority of patients with multivessel disease do not undergo CABG, primarily due to financial constraints, high surgical risk, and patient preference.
Introduction Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is the most effective coronary revascularization procedure, and it has been endorsed by many trials and studies over the years. However, due to CABG's immediate adverse effects, patients tend to prefer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary revascularization over it. This article focuses on the recent downtrend in CABG procedures for revascularization among patients for whom it is indicated. This study’s main objective was to identify the factors responsible for the downtrend in patients undergoing CABG despite a clear indication for it in those with multivessel diseases. Methods This study was conducted at the Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan, from August 1, 2020, to January 1, 2021. A total of 340 patients with a class-I indication (presence of conditions regarding which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is beneficial, useful, and effective) for CABG were enrolled in the study. Data related to all the variables were collected from patients and hospital records through an adequately designed proforma. For analysis, we applied the chi-square test to elaborate on the data for information and point biserial correlation to rule out the effect of age and weight on CABG’s downward trend. Results The mean age of the patients was 58.77 ± 9.54 years; 65.88% were male, and 34.12% were female. Only 17.65% of the patients underwent CABG; 71.47% opted for medical treatment, and 9.41% underwent PCI. Out of the 280 patients who did not undergo CABG, 26.76% had financial issues; 23.82% were high-risk patients and hence refused surgeries by the surgeons; 20.59% of patients were not willing to undergo surgery; 7.94% were on the waiting list, and 3.24% had deranged renal function tests (RFTs). Conclusions A limited number of patients underwent revascularization therapy even though they had clear indications for CABG. The high-risk status of patients, patients' unwillingness, and the cost of the procedure were the primary reasons behind the downtrend in CABG procedures among patients with a clear indication for the same.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Multivessel coronary artery disease (n=340). Class-I indication for CABG was evaluated on Rate of CABG procedure utilization. Only 17.65% of patients with a class-I indication for CABG underwent the procedure, with the main reasons for refusal being financial issues, high-risk profiles, and patient unwillingness.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: