Key result
Dark-blood LGE MRI shows ~99% accuracy for detecting non-ischemic myocardial scar versus bright-blood LGE.
Why the study?
Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement is reliable in ischemic cardiomyopathy, but its utility compared with conventional bright-blood LGE needed evaluation in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.
Is dark-blood LGE MRI non-inferior to conventional bright-blood LGE for detecting and quantifying non-ischemic myocardial scarring in patients with suspected non-ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Cross-Sectional (n=343)
Readers blinded to clinical data
No
Is dark-blood LGE MRI non-inferior to conventional bright-blood LGE for detecting and quantifying non-ischemic myocardial scarring in patients with suspected non-ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Dark-blood LGE MRI is a highly accurate alternative to conventional bright-blood LGE for detecting non-ischemic myocardial scarring without prolonging scan time.
May support dark-blood LGE as alternative for non-ischemic scar detection; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
(1) Background and Objectives: Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement has been shown to be a reliable cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) method for assessing viability and depicting myocardial scarring in ischemic cardiomyopathy. The aim of this study was to evaluate dark-blood LGE imaging compared with conventional bright-blood LGE for the detection of myocardial scarring in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. (2) Materials and Methods: Patients with suspected non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were prospectively enrolled in this single-centre study from January 2020 to March 2023. All patients underwent 1.5 T CMR with both dark-blood and conventional bright-blood LGE imaging. Corresponding short-axis stacks of both techniques were analysed for the presence, distribution, pattern, and localisation of LGE, as well as the quantitative scar size (%). (3) Results: 343 patients (age 44 ± 17 years; 124 women) with suspected non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were examined. LGE was detected in 123 of 343 cases (36%) with excellent inter-reader agreement (κ 0.97–0.99) for both LGE techniques. Dark-blood LGE showed a sensitivity of 99% (CI 98–100), specificity of 99% (CI 98–100), and an accuracy of 99% (CI 99–100) for the detection of non-ischemic scarring. No significant difference in total scar size (%) was observed. Dark-blood imaging with mean 5.35 ± 4.32% enhanced volume of total myocardial volume, bright-blood with 5.24 ± 4.28%, p = 0.84. (4) Conclusions: Dark-blood LGE imaging is non-inferior to conventional bright-blood LGE imaging in detecting non-ischemic scarring. Therefore, dark-blood LGE imaging may become an equivalent method for the detection of both ischemic and non-ischemic scars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brendel et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=343). Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement MRI vs. Conventional bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement MRI was evaluated on Accuracy for detection of non-ischemic scarring (using bright-blood LGE as reference) (95% CI 99-100). Dark-blood LGE MRI demonstrated 99% accuracy for detecting non-ischemic scarring compared to conventional bright-blood LGE, with no significant difference in total scar size.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: