Key result
Dark-blood LGE CMR detected more subjects with papillary muscle fibrosis than bright-blood LGE CMR in patients with mitral valve prolapse.
Why the study?
Conventional bright-blood LGE CMR suffers from poor scar-to-blood contrast that may limit sensitivity for papillary muscle fibrosis in MVP, unlike dark-blood LGE.
Does dark-blood LGE CMR improve the detection of papillary muscle fibrosis compared to bright-blood LGE CMR in patients with mitral valve prolapse?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
Does dark-blood LGE CMR improve the detection of papillary muscle fibrosis compared to bright-blood LGE CMR in patients with mitral valve prolapse?
Dark-blood LGE CMR is significantly more sensitive than conventional bright-blood LGE for detecting papillary muscle fibrosis in patients with mitral valve prolapse.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dark-blood LGE detects more papillary muscle fibrosis in MVP than bright-blood; leaves open impact on arrhythmia risk stratification.
PURPOSE: Papillary muscle fibrosis may act as an arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Previous studies used conventional bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE CMR) imaging to assess papillary muscle fibrosis, although this technique suffers from poor scar-to-blood contrast which may limit its sensitivity, in contrast to dark-blood LGE. This study sought to compare bright-blood and dark-blood LGE for the detection of papillary muscle fibrosis in patients with MVP. METHOD: 60 patients with known isolated MVP referred for CMR were prospectively recruited. A routine CMR protocol was used to obtain cine imaging, dark-blood LGE and bright-blood LGE in three long-axis views and a stack of short-axis views. Flow mapping of the proximal aorta was performed to calculate mitral regurgitant volume. Images were analysed for cardiac volumes, ejection fraction, mitral regurgitation severity, MVP characteristics (mitral annular disjunction, prolapse volume) and presence of LGE at the papillary muscles and myocardium. RESULTS: Dark-blood LGE detected significantly more subjects with LGE at the papillary muscles than bright-blood LGE (35% vs 15%, p = 0.002). There was no difference between LGE techniques regarding myocardial (non-papillary muscle) fibrosis (present in 25% each). No statistical differences were observed between patients with or without LGE at the papillary muscles regarding demographics, clinical data (including ventricular arrhythmia) and MVP characteristics. Furthermore, no association was found between LGE at the papillary muscles and at the myocardium. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to bright-blood LGE, dark-blood LGE CMR improves the detection of LGE at the papillary muscles in patients with MVP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heyning et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) (n=60). Dark-blood LGE CMR vs. Bright-blood LGE CMR was evaluated on Detection of LGE at the papillary muscles (p=0.002). Dark-blood LGE CMR detected more subjects with papillary muscle fibrosis than bright-blood LGE CMR in patients with mitral valve prolapse.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: