Why the study?
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging of the papillary muscles predict biopsy-proven left ventricular fibrosis in patients with severe mitral valve prolapse?
Population
19 patients with mitral valve prolapse and indication for surgery due to severe mitral regurgitation, and 21…
Comparison
Preoperative cardiovascular magnetic resonance… vs Healthy volunteers and intraoperative LV…
Design
Cross-sectional
Key result
Mitral valve prolapse patients exhibited a dark-appearance of the papillary muscles with significantly higher native T1 (1096 vs 994 ms) and extracellular volume (33.9% vs 25.9%) compared to healthy volunteers.
Authors
Loading...
DB-LGE at posteromedial PM on CMR was associated with biopsy-proven LV fibrosis in surgical MVP; hypothesis-generating for noninvasive detection, prospective validation needed.
Cross-Sectional (n=40)
Blinded to clinical and echocardiographic data
No
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging of the papillary muscles predict biopsy-proven left ventricular fibrosis in patients with severe mitral valve prolapse?
Absolute Event Rate: 1096% vs 994%
p-value: p=<0.001
Dark blood late gadolinium enhancement CMR of the posteromedial papillary muscle may serve as a better predictor of biopsy-proven LV inferobasal fibrosis than conventional CMR techniques in patients with severe mitral valve prolapse.
Spampinato et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Mitral valve prolapse with severe mitral regurgitation (n=40). Mitral valve prolapse vs. Healthy volunteers was evaluated on Papillary muscle native T1 (p=<0.001). Mitral valve prolapse patients exhibited a dark-appearance of the papillary muscles with significantly higher native T1 (1096 vs 994 ms) and extracellular volume (33.9% vs 25.9%) compared to healthy volunteers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: