Key result
In patients with atrial fibrillation not on anticoagulation, annual ischemic stroke risk was 0.22% for CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 and 0.38% for score 2, with significant variation across specific risk factors.
Why the study?
Whether each combination of CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 or 2 confers a similar stroke risk in patients with documented AF is poorly understood.
Does the specific combination of risk factors in CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 1 or 2 affect ischemic stroke risk in patients with AF not on oral anticoagulation?
Cohort (n=34,470)
Does the specific combination of risk factors in CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 1 or 2 affect ischemic stroke risk in patients with AF not on oral anticoagulation?
Ischemic stroke risk varies significantly depending on the specific risk factors comprising a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 or 2, suggesting oral anticoagulation decisions should consider individual factors rather than just the aggregate score.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support deferring anticoagulation in select low-score AF; leaves open need for randomized validation of factor-specific thresholds.
Introduction The CHA2DS2-VASc score is commonly used to assess ischemic stroke risk in patients with documented atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether each combination of CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 or 2 confers a similar stroke risk is poorly understood. Methods A de-identified database of aggregated electronic health record (EHR) data from 2007–2017 was used to identify patients not on oral anticoagulation (OAC) who had documented AF and CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 1 or 2. CHA2DS2-VASc=1 groups included patients with only heart failure, hypertension, age 65–74, diabetes, vascular disease or female gender. The 17 possible permutations of CHA2DS2-VASc =2 scores were consolidated into 6 groups: prior stroke/TIA, age >75, 2 co-morbidities, 1 co-morbidity + age 65–74, 1 co-morbidity + female gender, or age 65–74 + female gender. Stroke risk hazard ratios were computed for each of these groups. Results A total of 34,470 patients (61.0±12.0 years, 67.3% male) not on OAC with a documented history of AF and CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 1 (n=16,572) or 2 (n=17,898) were identified. The annual risks of ischemic stroke among CHA2DS2-VASc 1 and 2 patients were 0.22% [0.18–0.26] and 0.38% [0.33–0.43], respectively. For CHA2DS2-VASc =1 patients, age 65–74 conferred a greater risk of stroke while female gender conferred a lower risk. For CHA2DS2-VASc =2 patients, prior stroke/TIA conferred a greater risk of stroke while 1 co-morbidity + female gender conferred a lower risk [Figure]. Conclusion Ischemic stroke risk varies significantly across specific risk factors in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores =1 or 2. Therefore, OAC decisions in these patients should consider individual risk factors rather than the aggregate score alone. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Medtronic
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zweibel et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=34,470). CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 vs. CHA2DS2-VASc score 2 was evaluated on Ischemic stroke. In patients with atrial fibrillation not on anticoagulation, annual ischemic stroke risk was 0.22% for CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 and 0.38% for score 2, with significant variation across specific risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: