A simulation tool to predict the heavy ion cross section is proposed. A 20% average error between experimental and simulated results is shown for a SRAM in a commercial 130 nm CMOS technology. Input parameters are obtained by device or circuit simulations and no fitting parameters or empirical calibration with previous radiation testings is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Correas et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: