Key result
An integrated heart failure palliative care program can significantly improve quality of life for heart failure patients at the end of life.
Why the study?
Does the integration of palliative care improve quality of life in heart failure patients at end-of-life?
Does the integration of palliative care improve quality of life in heart failure patients at end-of-life?
Integrating palliative care into heart failure end-of-life management improves quality of life and ensures care aligns with patient preferences.
Integrate palliative care into HF end-of-life programs now; confirms North American and European society recommendations on key components.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review discusses the integration of guideline and evidence-based palliative care into heart failure end-of-life (EOL) care. RECENT FINDINGS: North American and European heart failure societies recommend the integration of palliative care into heart failure programs. Advance care planning, shared decision-making, routine measurement of symptoms and quality of life and specialist palliative care at heart failure EOL are identified as key components to an effective heart failure palliative care program. There is limited evidence to support the effectiveness of the individual elements. However, results from the palliative care in heart failure trial suggest an integrated heart failure palliative care program can significantly improve quality of life for heart failure patients at EOL. SUMMARY: Integration of a palliative approach to heart failure EOL care helps to ensure patients receive the care that is congruent with their values, wishes and preferences. Specialist palliative care referrals are limited to those who are truly at heart failure EOL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacIver et al. (2017) conducted a review in Heart failure. Palliative care was evaluated. An integrated heart failure palliative care program can significantly improve quality of life for heart failure patients at the end of life.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: