Key result
Cold ischemic preservation of donor hearts caused greater contractile dysfunction, cell death, and inflammasome expression in the left ventricle compared to the right ventricle.
Why the study?
Dysfunction and inflammation after cold ischemic preservation may differ between the left and right ventricles, suggesting distinct amelioration strategies.
Does cold ischemic preservation induce differential functional and inflammatory responses in the left versus right ventricle of donor hearts?
Does cold ischemic preservation induce differential functional and inflammatory responses in the left versus right ventricle of donor hearts?
Cold ischemic preservation of donor hearts disproportionately impairs left ventricular function and drives greater left ventricular cell death and inflammasome activation compared to the right ventricle.
May support ventricle-specific preservation strategies in transplantation; hypothesis-generating in murine model, clinical validation needed.
Background Dysfunction and inflammation of hearts subjected to cold ischemic preservation may differ between left and right ventricles, suggesting distinct strategies for amelioration. Methods and Results Explanted murine hearts subjected to cold ischemia for 0, 4, or 8 h in preservation solution were assessed for function during 60 min of warm perfusion and then analyzed for cell death and inflammation by immunohistochemistry and western blotting and total RNA sequencing. Increased cold ischemic times led to greater left ventricle (LV) dysfunction compared to right ventricle (RV). The LV experienced greater cell death assessed by TUNEL+ cells and cleaved caspase-3 expression (n = 4). While IL-6 protein levels were upregulated in both LV and RV, IL-1β, TNFα, IL-10, and MyD88 were disproportionately increased in the LV. Inflammasome components (NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3), adaptor molecule apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC), cleaved caspase-1) and products (cleaved IL-1β and gasdermin D) were also more upregulated in the LV. Pathway analysis of RNA sequencing showed increased signaling related to tumor necrosis factor, interferon, and innate immunity with ex-vivo ischemia, but no significant differences were found between the LV and RV. Human donor hearts showed comparable inflammatory responses to cold ischemia with greater LV increases of TNFα, IL-10, and inflammasomes (n = 3). Conclusions Mouse hearts subjected to cold ischemia showed time-dependent contractile dysfunction and increased cell death, inflammatory cytokine expression and inflammasome expression that are greater in the LV than RV. However, IL-6 protein elevations and altered transcriptional profiles were similar in both ventricles. Similar changes are observed in human hearts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2021) studied Donor heart preservation (n=7). Cold ischemic preservation vs. Right ventricle was evaluated on Ventricular function, cell death, and inflammation. Cold ischemic preservation of donor hearts caused greater contractile dysfunction, cell death, and inflammasome expression in the left ventricle compared to the right ventricle.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: