Key result
Transvenous lead extraction in octogenarians had similar major complication rates to younger patients (2.0% vs 1.38%), but long-term mortality was higher (39.67% vs 24.41%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
It remained a matter of debate whether transvenous lead extraction is a safe treatment choice in elderly patients.
Is transvenous lead extraction safe and effective in octogenarians and nonagenarians compared to younger patients?
Cohort (n=3,810)
Yes
Is transvenous lead extraction safe and effective in octogenarians and nonagenarians compared to younger patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 39.67% vs 24.41%
p-value: p=<0.001
Transvenous lead extraction is safe and effective in octogenarians and nonagenarians, with major complication rates comparable to younger patients, indicating that advanced age alone should not preclude candidacy for the procedure.
INTRODUCTION: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has become a frequently used tool for the management of complications related to pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. However, it is still a matter of debate whether the lead extraction procedure is a safe treatment choice in the elderly. METHODS: We collected the clinical information from 3,810 patients undergoing TLE in 2 high-volume centers (Poland and Italy) between 2006 and 2017. We tested risk factors, effectiveness, safety and long-term survival in 3 groups of patients: those aged 80-89.99 years, ≥90 years and 30-79.99 years. RESULTS: Lower BMI, lower levels of hemoglobin and more comorbidities characterized the patients, whose ages ranged from 80 to 89.99 years. Those aged ≥90 years most often had single-chamber pacemakers. Octogenarians and nonagenarians were more often undergoing TLE due to infectious indications (57.19 and 74.29 vs. 45.35% in younger individuals). Lead age and the number of leads extracted were comparable in the 3 groups. In octogenarians, leads were more often removed using standard extraction techniques: simple traction and mechanical dilatators, whereas in nonagenarians TLE was more complex. The duration of the procedure was shorter in older patients, while clinical and procedural effectiveness was similar to that in younger individuals. The rate of major complications related to TLE did not differ between octogenarians and younger subjects (2.0 vs. 1.38%, p = ns), and the number of procedure-related risk factors was smaller in older people. Nonagenarians did not develop any major complication related to TLE. Long-term mortality after TLE was similar among octogenarians and nonagenarians (39.67 and 40.00%) but higher than in younger patients (24.41; p < 0.001 and 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Lead extraction procedures appear effective and safe in octogenarians and nonagenarians, comparable to younger individuals. Procedure-related risk in the elderly is not associated with most of the typical risk factors encountered in younger subjects, but only with the higher number of pacemaker, implantable cardiac defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy device procedures before TLE. Long-term survival after TLE was found to be similar among octogenarians and nonagenarians being about 60% at over 3 years of follow-up. Age alone should not be considered a risk factor for the occurrence of major complications or procedure-related death, and therefore it should not prevent candidacy for TLE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacheć et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Complications related to pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (n=3,810). Older age (octogenarians and nonagenarians) vs. Younger patients (aged 30-79.99 years) was evaluated on Long-term mortality (p=<0.001). Transvenous lead extraction in octogenarians had similar major complication rates to younger patients (2.0% vs 1.38%), but long-term mortality was higher (39.67% vs 24.41%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: