Key result
Extended-window IV thrombolysis improves functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke versus control.
Why the study?
Emerging evidence supports IV thrombolysis beyond the standard 4.5-hour window, leading to expanded recommendations, but sources of between-study heterogeneity remained to be explored.
Does IV thrombolysis improve excellent functional recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting 4.5 to 24 hours from last known well?
Meta-Analysis
Does IV thrombolysis improve excellent functional recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting 4.5 to 24 hours from last known well?
Extended-window IV thrombolysis improves functional outcomes for patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, particularly in settings where thrombectomy is unavailable.
Supports extended-window thrombolysis for moderate-to-severe stroke when thrombectomy unavailable; extends RCT evidence to 24-hour presentations.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV thrombolysis (IVT) is the standard-of-care evidence-based treatment of eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Emerging evidence supports its use beyond this time window, leading to expanded recommendations for selected patients presenting between 4.5 and 24 hours. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate IVT in the 4.5- to 24-hour window and to explore sources of between-study heterogeneity. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception through February 2026. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or individual patient-data meta-analyses of RCTs comparing IVT with control in patients with AIS presenting beyond 4.5 hours from last known well. The primary outcome was excellent functional recovery, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (mRS of 0-2 at 90 days); change in mRS disability, quantified as the common odds ratio (OR) for a 1-point improvement across the full ordinal mRS distribution (ordinal analysis); and safety measures such as 90-day mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were pooled. Multivariable meta-regression simultaneously modeled thrombolytic agent, endovascular thrombectomy context, and territory to disentangle confounded predictors. RESULTS: = 0.032 for mRS 0-2) is the primary driver of between-study heterogeneity, explaining 66%-100% of intertrial variance. DISCUSSION: Extended-window IVT improves functional outcomes across a wider spectrum of stroke subgroups than previously recognized. The benefit seems greatest for patients with more severe strokes in settings where thrombectomy is unavailable, providing the evidence base for offering a critical reperfusion strategy for the substantial proportion of patients worldwide who lack timely access to thrombectomy. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides American Academy of Neurology Class I evidence that IVT administered 4.5-24 hours after moderate-to-severe AIS onset in patients with salvageable tissue, where thrombectomy is not readily available, improves functional outcome at 90 days without increasing mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doheim et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in acute ischemic stroke. IV thrombolysis vs. control was evaluated on excellent functional recovery, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 at 90 days. Extended-window IV thrombolysis improves functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke, with an unspecified factor explaining 66%-100% of intertrial variance (P=0.032 for mRS 0-2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: