Investigates the impact of pore-throat structures on movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoirs, indicating key insights for reservoir quality assessment.
Tight sandstone reservoirs commonly develop multiscale pore-throat systems, and differences in pore-throat structure influence movable fluid occurrence and seepage capacity. In this study, the Chang-6 3 tight sandstone reservoir within the Chang-6 interval in the Huaqing area, Ordos Basin, was investigated using casting thin sections, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, high-pressure mercury intrusion porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance, and multiscale fractal analysis to clarify pore-throat structure and its control on movable fluid occurrence. The results show that reservoir space is dominated by residual intergranular pores, dissolution pores, and intercrystalline pores, with pore-throat sizes mainly concentrated between 0.04 and 0.18 μ m. Movable fluid saturation ranges from 20.98% to 55.90%, averaging 35.23%, and decreases from type II to type IV reservoirs. NMR pore partitioning based on the T₂ cutoff shows that movable fluids are mainly hosted in mesopores, contributing 34.75%-76.28%; micropores mainly control bound fluid occurrence, whereas macropores contribute limited movable fluids where connectivity is poor. NMR and HPMI fractal results indicate that mesopore- and macropore-related fractal dimensions generally fall within the effective fractal range, whereas micropore-related dimensions deviate from the conventional range. SEM box-counting results show that poorer-quality reservoirs have more complex pore boundaries. Sensitivity analyses of SEM thresholds, NMR pore partitioning based on the T 2cutoff , and HPMI segmentation boundaries confirm that the main mesopore- and macropore-related interpretations remain stable. These findings identify mesopores as the dominant pore-throat scale controlling movable fluid storage and seepage, providing multiscale fractal evidence for evaluating movable fluid occurrence and reservoir quality in tight sandstones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: