Key result
Aspirin plus ticagrelor was not found to be superior to aspirin plus clopidogrel in reducing the rate of ischemic vascular events at 180 days after intracranial stenting (1.5% vs. 9.1%, p=0.125).
Why the study?
It was unknown whether aspirin plus ticagrelor attenuates ischemic vascular events without increasing bleeding risk compared with aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients who underwent intracranial stenting.
Does aspirin plus ticagrelor reduce ischemic vascular events compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intracranial stenting?
Cohort (n=340)
No
Does aspirin plus ticagrelor reduce ischemic vascular events compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intracranial stenting?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.5% vs 9.1%
p-value: p=0.125
In patients undergoing intracranial stenting for acute ischemic stroke, aspirin plus ticagrelor was not superior to aspirin plus clopidogrel in reducing ischemic events or restenosis, and bleeding risk was similar.
Aspirin-ticagrelor shows no advantage over clopidogrel-based DAPT after intracranial stenting; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Objective: It was unknown whether a regimen of aspirin plus ticagrelor (aspirin-ticagrelor) attenuates ischemic vascular events without increasing bleeding risk in patients who had undergone intracranial stenting compared with an aspirin plus clopidogrel (aspirin-clopidogrel) regimen. This article compares the efficacy and safety outcomes of the two double antibody regimens in patients undergoing intracranial stent and investigates whether aspirin-ticagrelor could be an alternative antiplatelet agent without increasing the risk of bleeding. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of our database for patients who had undergone intracranial stenting. From January 2017 to May 2021, consecutive patients treated with endovascular stenting were identified and dichotomized by whether aspirin-ticagrelor or aspirin-clopidogrel were used. The outcomes were compared by propensity score matching. Results: = 0.125] was lower in the aspirin-ticagrelor group than in the aspirin-clopidogrel group, there were no statistical differences. There were no statistical differences in ischemic vascular events, ischemic stroke, or death up to 180 days between the two groups. In addition, the incidence of bleeding did not differ. No intracranial hemorrhage or mild bleeding occurred. No statistically significant difference was noted in restenosis and symptomatic restenosis at follow-up. Conclusion: In our study involving patients with acute ischemic stroke who had undergone intracranial stenting, aspirin-ticagrelor was not found to be superior to aspirin-clopidogrel in reducing the rate of ischemic vascular events. The risk of bleeding did not differ between the two groups. Aspirin-ticagrelor does not lower total restenosis and symptomatic restenosis risk at follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) (n=340). Aspirin plus ticagrelor vs. Aspirin plus clopidogrel was evaluated on Ischemic vascular events (composite of ischemic stroke, TIA, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular causes) at 180 days (p=0.125). Aspirin plus ticagrelor was not found to be superior to aspirin plus clopidogrel in reducing the rate of ischemic vascular events at 180 days after intracranial stenting (1.5% vs. 9.1%, p=0.125).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: