Why the study?
The study was conducted to comprehensively elucidate the historical evolution, advancements, efficacy, and safety of traditional and newer pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in managing cardiac complications.
This narrative review summarizes the historical evolution, advancements, efficacy, and safety of pacemakers and ICDs in managing cardiac complications.
Provides overview of pacemaker/ICD evolution; leaves open need for prospective trials on long-term outcomes.
This review article aims to comprehensively elucidate the historical evolution, advancements, efficacy, and safety of traditional and newer pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), in the management of cardiac complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2024) conducted a review in Cardiac arrhythmias. Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: