Key result
Circulating microRNAs are proposed as promising biomarkers for the early subclinical detection of diabetic cardiomyopathy to identify patients at high risk of disease development.
Circulating microRNAs represent a promising future diagnostic tool for detecting subclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy before the onset of diastolic dysfunction, addressing a gap in current biochemical and imaging methods.
Enables earlier risk stratification in diabetes; extends microRNA biomarker evidence from RCTs to subclinical cardiomyopathy detection.
The prevalence of cardiac diabetic diseases has been increased around the world, being the most common cause of death and disability among diabetic patients. In particular, diabetic cardiomyopathy is characterized with a diastolic dysfunction and cardiac remodelling without signs of hypertension and coronary artery diseases. In an early stage, it is an asymptomatic disease; however, clinical studies demonstrate that diabetic myocardia are more vulnerable to injury derived by acute myocardial infarct and are the worst prognosis for rehabilitation. Currently, biochemical and imaging diagnostic methods are unable to detect subclinical manifestation of the disease (prior to diastolic dysfunction). In this review, we elaborately discuss the current scientific evidences to propose circulating microRNAs as promising biomarkers for early detection of diabetic cardiomyopathy and, then, to identify patients at high risk of diabetic cardiomyopathy development. Moreover, here we summarise the research strategies to identify miRNAs as potential biomarkers, present limitations, challenges, and future perspectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
León et al. (2015) conducted a review in Diabetic cardiomyopathy. Circulating microRNAs was evaluated. Circulating microRNAs are proposed as promising biomarkers for the early subclinical detection of diabetic cardiomyopathy to identify patients at high risk of disease development.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: