Key result
Single-shot steady-state free precession detected myocardial edema in patients with acute myocardial infarction with 80% sensitivity and 89% specificity compared to STIR imaging.
Why the study?
Does single-shot SSFP MRI accurately detect myocardial edema compared to STIR imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=10)
Does single-shot SSFP MRI accurately detect myocardial edema compared to STIR imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Single-shot SSFP is a feasible technique for detecting myocardial edema in patients with acute myocardial infarction, offering moderate sensitivity and high specificity.
SSFP may support faster edema detection in acute MI excluding MVO; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the ability of single-shot, T(2)/T(1) weighted steady-state free precession (SSFP) to detect myocardial edema in patients with an acute myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed in a series of patients (n = 10) referred for the assessment of acute myocardial infarcts (AMI). Localizers were used to obtain true short axis views of the left ventricle (LV). These views were used to plan and obtain T(2)-weighted STIR (short TI inversion recovery) images of the LV. These slices were then acquired using single-shot dark blood-prepared SSFP with a large (31) number of dummy pulses. Lastly, Contrast agent was injected, and late enhancement (LE) images were acquired. Images were analyzed using a multi-segment model of the heart. SSFP images were compared with STIR images, with STIR images used as the standard of truth for the presence of edema. LE images were used to identify segments which were positive for microvascular obstruction. RESULTS: All techniques were successful in all patients. A total of 312 segments were analyzed. Excluding segments positive for microvascular obstruction, SSFP had a sensitivity/specificity of 80%/89%. Including segments positive for microvascular obstruction, sensitivity/specificity was 71%/88%. On a patient-based analysis, no AMI was missed using SSFP (sensitivity = 100%). CONCLUSION: Using single-shot SSFP to detect myocardial edema in patients with AMI is feasible with a moderate sensitivity and high specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Green et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute myocardial infarction (n=10). Single-shot steady-state free precession (SSFP) vs. T(2)-weighted STIR images was evaluated on Detection of myocardial edema. Single-shot steady-state free precession detected myocardial edema in patients with acute myocardial infarction with 80% sensitivity and 89% specificity compared to STIR imaging.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: