Key result
Three distinct symptom detection groups were identified (over-estimation 6.1%, consistent 69.7%, under-estimation 24.2%), with no significant relationship found between these groups and self-care.
Why the study?
Patients with HF may struggle to detect symptom changes, and prior research predominantly relied on medical record reviews or patient recall rather than prospective exploration.
Is symptom detection ability associated with self-care in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=132)
Is symptom detection ability associated with self-care in patients with heart failure?
Heart failure patients exhibit distinct symptom detection patterns (over-estimation, consistent, under-estimation) compared to nurse assessments, but these patterns are not significantly associated with self-care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Symptom detection varies widely in HF without linking to self-care; leaves open whether tailored monitoring improves outcomes.
AIM: Patients with heart failure (HF) may have difficulty detecting symptom changes. However, most research has relied on medical record reviews or patient recall. Therefore, it is important to prospectively explore symptom detection in HF and the relationship with self-care. This study aimed at (i) prospectively identifying distinct symptom detection groups and comparing characteristics among the groups and (ii) exploring the association between symptom detection groups and self-care. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients rated their shortness of breath (SOB) using the modified Borg scale at four-time points after a 6-min walk test (6-MWT). A trained nurse simultaneously and independently rated patients' SOB using the same scale. Latent class growth modelling was used to identify distinct trajectories of the differences in SOB ratings between the patients and nurses after the 6-MWT. After identifying the symptom detection groups, the characteristics of each group were compared, and the relationship between self-care and the symptom detection groups was examined using the multivariate linear regression. Three distinct symptom detection groups were identified: over-estimation (6.1%), consistent (69.7%), and under-estimation (24.2%) groups. There were no significant sample characteristics among the three symptom detection groups, except for attention. There was no relationship between self-care and symptom detection groups. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three distinct symptom detection groups, implying that different approaches are needed to improve patients' symptom detection ability. The non-significant relationship between the symptom detection groups and self-care may be because we only measured symptom detection, which is only one aspect of the symptom perception process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=132). Symptom detection groups was evaluated on Distinct trajectories of differences in shortness of breath ratings between patients and nurses, and association with self-care. Three distinct symptom detection groups were identified (over-estimation 6.1%, consistent 69.7%, under-estimation 24.2%), with no significant relationship found between these groups and self-care.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: