Key result
Running speed at 90% maximum heart rate during a submaximal running test was the most sensitive variable to monitor adaptation to endurance training.
Why the study?
Can a submaximal running test with postexercise HRR, HRV, and CMJ measurements monitor endurance training adaptation in endurance-trained men and women?
Population
35 endurance-trained men and women
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
18 weeks
Authors
Loading...
May aid non-invasive monitoring of endurance adaptations; leaves open validation in larger prospective trials before routine adoption.
Cohort (n=35)
Can a submaximal running test with postexercise HRR, HRV, and CMJ measurements monitor endurance training adaptation in endurance-trained men and women?
Running speed at 90% HRmax intensity during a submaximal running test is a sensitive variable to monitor adaptation to endurance training, while postexercise HRR, HRV, and CMJ are not significantly correlated with maximal endurance performance changes.
Vesterinen et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Endurance-trained athletes (n=35). Submaximal running test (SRT) was evaluated on Change in maximal endurance performance and maximal oxygen uptake. Running speed at 90% maximum heart rate during a submaximal running test was the most sensitive variable to monitor adaptation to endurance training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: