Key result
Internal carotid artery peak systolic velocities measured by Acuson 128 and Siemens Quantum colour Doppler systems showed limits of agreement of -0.47 to 0.45 m/s, indicating interchangeability.
Why the study?
Do the Acuson 128 and Siemens Quantum colour Doppler systems agree sufficiently to be interchangeable in measuring internal carotid artery peak systolic velocities in patients at risk of stroke?
Observational (n=63)
Blinded
Do the Acuson 128 and Siemens Quantum colour Doppler systems agree sufficiently to be interchangeable in measuring internal carotid artery peak systolic velocities in patients at risk of stroke?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Acuson 128 and Siemens Quantum colour Doppler systems agree sufficiently to be interchangeable for evaluating carotid artery disease, though operator/system variations could affect stenosis grading.
The study was undertaken to determine if the internal carotid artery peak systolic velocities (ICA PSVs) measured by two colour Doppler imaging systems (Acuson 128 and Siemens Quantum) agree sufficiently for the two systems to be interchangeable in evaluating carotid artery disease. One operator obtained blinded measurements of ICA PSV in 63 prospective nonrandomized patients at risk of stroke. The operator examined 20 patients in the first cohort to assess the intraobserver variation, and 43 patients in the second cohort to assess the limits of agreement between the systems. In vitro comparisons of the systems were also undertaken, using both string and flow phantoms. Excluding one outlier, the intraobserver reproducibility coefficient for both machines was 0.48 m s-1. The limits of agreement (within which 95% of differences lie) between systems were -0.47 to 0.45 m s-1. This reduced to -0.39 to 0.33 m s-1 when the one outlier was excluded. This is within the intraobserver reproducibility range. In vitro data show little intersystem variation with phantom velocity. Intratransducer differences increase when the Doppler angle is increased using the string phantom; maximum differences: Acuson 0.30 m s-1 (42%) and Siemens 0.32 m s-1 (32%). These are within the in vivo reproducibility range. Intratransducer difference decreases when the Doppler angle is increased using the flow phantom, maximum differences: Acuson 0.05 m s-1 and Siemens 0.07 m s-1. The results show the systems agree sufficiently to be interchangeable in evaluating carotid artery disease; however, errors in maximum PSVs, caused by operator or system variation, may lead to errors in percent stenosis grading of the carotid arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolstenhulme et al. (1997) conducted an observational in At risk of stroke / Carotid artery disease (n=63). Acuson 128 colour Doppler imaging system vs. Siemens Quantum colour Doppler imaging system was evaluated on Limits of agreement between systems for internal carotid artery peak systolic velocities (Limits of agreement -0.47 to 0.45 m s-1). Internal carotid artery peak systolic velocities measured by Acuson 128 and Siemens Quantum colour Doppler systems showed limits of agreement of -0.47 to 0.45 m/s, indicating interchangeability.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: