Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation worsens prognosis after myocardial infarction, and there remains intense debate regarding the optimal surgical management of moderate IMR during coronary revascularization.
Chronic ischemic mitral valve regurgitation is a result of disturbed left ventricular geometry secondary to myocardial ischemia in the absence of intrinsic mitral valve pathology. It is a common complication after myocardial infarction, and patients who have ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) have a worse prognosis compared to patients who have ischemic heart disease alone, and this is directly related to the severity of IMR. Medical therapy has limited efficacy, and surgical options including various repair techniques and valve replacement had been tried with variable success. Still there is intense debate among surgeons whether to interfere with moderate degree IMR at the time of coronary artery revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altarabsheh et al. (2018) conducted a review in Chronic ischemic mitral valve regurgitation. Mitral valve repair or replacement was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: