Key result
Extended cardiac rehabilitation programs did not improve the SCORE 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk at 18 months compared to standard rehabilitation.
Why the study?
Do advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation programs improve the SCORE 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk function in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to standard cardiac rehabilitation?
RCT (n=914)
Do advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation programs improve the SCORE 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk function in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to standard cardiac rehabilitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Extending standard cardiac rehabilitation with extra behavioral counseling does not confer additional benefits on the SCORE 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk function at 18 months in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: The OPTICARE (OPTImal CArdiac REhabilitation) randomised controlled trial compared two advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes to standard CR for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These programmes were designed to stimulate permanent adoption of a heart-healthy lifestyle. The primary outcome was the SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk function at 18 months follow-up. METHODS: In total, 914 patients with ACS (age, 57 years; 81% men) were randomised to: (1) 3 months standard CR (CR-only); (2) standard CR including three additional face-to-face active lifestyle counselling sessions and extended with three group fitness training and general lifestyle counselling sessions in the first 9 months after standard CR (CR+F); or (3) standard CR extended for 9 months with five to six telephone general lifestyle counselling sessions (CR+T). RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, we found no difference in the SCORE risk function at 18 months between CR+F and CR-only (3.30% vs 3.47%; p=0.48), or CR+T and CR-only (3.02% vs 3.47%; p=0.39). In a per-protocol analysis, two of three modifiable SCORE parameters favoured CR+F over CR-only: current smoking (13.4% vs 21.3%; p<0.001) and total cholesterol (3.9 vs 4.3 mmol/L; p<0.001). The smoking rate was also lower in CR+T compared with the CR-only (12.9% vs 21.3%; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Extending CR with extra behavioural counselling (group sessions or individual telephone sessions) does not confer additional benefits with respect to SCORE parameters. Patients largely reach target levels for modifiable risk factors with few hospital readmissions already following standard CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01395095; results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sunamura et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in acute coronary syndrome (n=914). Advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation vs. Standard cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on SCORE 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk function at 18 months follow-up (p=0.48). Extended cardiac rehabilitation programs did not improve the SCORE 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk at 18 months compared to standard rehabilitation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: