Key result
Low serum BNP levels were associated with malignant etiology in patients undergoing pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion, demonstrating 90.0% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Malignant pericardial effusion indicates a poor prognosis and leads to cardiac tamponade, but the diagnostic and prognostic value of BNP levels across different effusion etiologies was unclear.
Does serum BNP level predict malignant etiology in patients with pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis?
Cohort (n=56)
No
Does serum BNP level predict malignant etiology in patients with pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis?
Low serum BNP levels (≤ 250 pg/ml) may serve as a useful biomarker to identify malignant etiology in patients presenting with pericardial effusion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Serum BNP may support etiology assessment in tamponade; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: The development of malignant pericardial effusion indicates a poor prognosis and is the leading cause of cardiac tamponade. The objectives of the study were to examine the levels of BNP in traumatic, malignant and non-malignant pericardial effusion etiologies, and to assess the value of serum and pericardial fluid BNP levels in the prognosis of malignant pericardial effusion. METHODS: A of 56 patients with clinical and echocardiographic diagnosis of pre-tamponade or tamponade who required pericardiocentesis were included in the study. BNP levels were assessed in the serum and within the pericardial fluid. The diagnostic value of BNP levels in discriminating between malignant and non- malignant etiology of pericardial effusion was examined using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC). RESULTS: Pericardial fluid BNP levels were similar across all etiology groups. In patients with malignant etiology, the amount of pericardial fluid was high and their serum BNP levels were relatively low. BNP levels were strong predictors of malignant pericardial effusion, and the cut-off point of BNP ≤ 250 pg/ml demonstrated the highest sensitivity (90.0%) for malignant etiology. CONCLUSIONS: Low serum BNP levels were significantly associated with malignancy in patients undergoing pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusions. Serum BNP levels <250 pg/ml may trigger more extensive diagnostic testing for malignant pericardial effusion in patients with small pericardial effusion who are not considered for pericardiocentesis due to small effusion, in whom the etiology is unclear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carasso et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Pericardial effusion (n=56). Serum BNP levels was evaluated on Malignant etiology of pericardial effusion (OR 0.995, 95% CI 0.991-0.999, p=0.01). Low serum BNP levels were associated with malignant etiology in patients undergoing pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion, demonstrating 90.0% sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: